Advancing Sustainable Development Goals through Environmental Governance: The Role of Indian Courts

Authors

  • Prof. Sushil Kumar Singh Teerthankar Mahaveer College of Law and Legal Studies, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68219/0askrq85

Keywords:

Sustainable Development Goals, Environmental Governance, Indian Courts, Environmental Jurisprudence, Sustainable Development

Abstract

The concept of sustainable development has become increasingly significant in contemporary environmental governance, emphasizing the need to maintain a delicate equilibrium among economic growth, environmental preservation, and social welfare. The successful accomplishment of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) necessitates a strong legislative framework and institutional mechanism to turn environmental intentions into binding duties. In India, the courts have rendered a valuable service to the field of environmental governance by virtue of constitutional interpretation, judicial activism, and environmental principles. The present paper aims to explore the significance of Indian courts in sustainable development via environmental jurisprudence. The paper employs a doctrinal and analytical methodology for researching environmental provisions in the Constitution, environmental laws and significant judicial rulings that have contributed immensely to the realm of environmental protection in India.The paper asserts that the Indian Courts are not only arbiters resolving disputes but have emerged as institutions of environmental governance through conservation of natural resources, ensuring accountability and assisting in the implementation of SDGs. It underscores the role of judicial intervention for attaining sustainable development in an environment-friendly manner.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Prof. Sushil Kumar Singh, Teerthankar Mahaveer College of Law and Legal Studies, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh

    Prof. Sushil Kumar Singh
    Principal
    Teerthankar Mahaveer College of Law and Legal Studies
    Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh

References

1. A.P. Pollution Control Board v. Prof. M.V. Nayudu (Retd.) and Others, (1999) 2 Supreme Court Cases (SCC) 718; Appeal Civil 53-54 of 1999 (India).

2. Bhuwania, A. (2017). Courting the People: Public Interest Litigation in Post-Emergency India. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.

3. Bosselmann, K. (2008). The Principle of Sustainability: Transforming Law and Governance. Legal Studies Series. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.

4. Constitution of India, 1950. Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India.

5. Divan, S., & Rosencranz, A. (2001). Environmental Law and Policy in India: Cases, Materials and Statutes. 2nd edition. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.

6. Divan, S., & Rosencranz, A. (2022). Environmental Law and Policy in India: Cases, Commentary and Materials. 3rd edition. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.

7. Gill, G. N. (2017). Environmental Justice in India: The National Green Tribunal. Routledge Explorations in Environmental Studies. London: Routledge.

8. Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India and Others, (1996) 3 Supreme Court Cases (SCC) 212; Judgment of 13 February 1996 (India).

9. Jain, M. P. (2018). Indian Constitutional Law. 8th edition. Gurugram, India: LexisNexis.

10. Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). "Environmental Governance." Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Volume 31, pp. 297–325.

11. M.C. Mehta and Sriram Food and Fertilizers v. Union of India and Others, All India Reporter (AIR) 1987 SC 1086; (1987) 1 SCC 395 (India).

12. M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath and Others, (1997) 1 Supreme Court Cases (SCC) 388; Writ Petition Civil No. 27 of 1996 (India).

13. National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 (Act No. 19 of 2010). Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 1.

14. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (1972). Recommendation of the Council on Guiding Principles concerning International Economic Aspects of Environmental Policies. C(72)128. Paris: OECD Publishing.

15. Sachs, J. D. (2015). The Age of Sustainable Development. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

16. Sax, J. L. (1970). "The Public Trust Doctrine in Natural Resource Law: Effective Judicial Intervention." Michigan Law Review, Volume 68, Number 3, pp. 471–566.

17. Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar and Others, All India Reporter (AIR) 1991 SC 420; 1991 SCR (1) 5 (India).

18. United Nations General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, A/RES/70/1. New York: United Nations.

19. United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. (1972). Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (Stockholm Declaration). Stockholm: UN Doc. A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1.

20. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. (1992). Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Rio de Janeiro: UN Doc. A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I).

21. Vellore Citizens' Welfare Forum v. Union of India and Others, (1996) 5 Supreme Court Cases (SCC) 647; All India Reporter (AIR) 1996 SC 2715 (India).

22. World Commission on Environment and Development [WCED]. (1987). Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

23. Young, O. R. (2002). The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. Global Environmental Accord Series. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-14

How to Cite

Advancing Sustainable Development Goals through Environmental Governance: The Role of Indian Courts. (2026). International Journal of Law, Public Policy and Global Governance (IJLPG), 1(1), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.68219/0askrq85